AI Bubble: 'This could humiliate the largest companies in the world'

usefulEd Zitron (The Tech Report)podcast2026-09-17read ai llmsbusiness

Synopsis — AI-drafted from Dan's notes

Zitron’s claim is that a large share of Nvidia’s data-centre revenue is chips that were bought and never installed. His anchor is Microsoft: a leaked breakdown he converts to power puts its AI chips at about 2 GW, against roughly 12 GW of claimed capacity. On his own assumption that about half of capital spending goes on GPUs, he scales that up to the industry and lands on a range of $100bn to $350bn of hardware sitting in warehouses, and says plainly that he is speculating.

The mechanism he offers is supply rationing: Nvidia’s buy-now-or-miss-the-next-generation terms make buyers race each other, and the chips age a generation before the buildings meant to hold them are finished. Chips that are not in service don’t depreciate, so the loss stays off the books until a write-down. His ask is a disclosure rule: hyperscalers should say how many chips they own and how many are actually online.

Where I land

The gap between the chip figure and the gigawatt announcements is the point. If we haven’t seen a big increase in GPU TDP, then where are all those chips? What I suppose he is getting at is that these companies are obfuscating their true onboarding capacity, and the question of why is valid. We need to find alternative ways to measure it.

The “mostly pre-orders” narrative does seem to hold. The backlog is real, plus these data centers are an order of magnitude bigger than anything these companies have built, so the construction delay is real. As is the growing legal and local backlash.

A rule requiring hyperscalers to disclose how many chips they own and how many are online would go a long way to rebuild trust with the public. We aren’t asking to see all internal documents, but it would materially help investors and the public reassess the risk involved.

Connections

Verified independently (2026-09-26):